DannyVerinder

November 2021

Hello, I'm Adakiko. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Ryke Geerd Hamer seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 11:08, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

"Balanced" doesn't mean whitewashing. If you have wp:reliable sources that support Hamer's work being "safe and effective", then let's hear it. Until then, it doesn't belong on Wikipedia. Adakiko (talk) 11:08, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

• My mistake, I should have used wp:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) (WP:MEDRS) Thank you Adakiko (talk) 11:12, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
• I would recommend discussing major changes such as this on talk:Ryke Geerd Hamer and get wp:consensus before making them as major changes, even if properly cited, can be an issue. See help:talk pages, also help:referencing for beginners Adakiko (talk) 11:19, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ryke Geerd Hamer. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ryke Geerd Hamer was changed by DannyVerinder (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.960981 on 2021-11-20T12:33:32+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:33, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Ryke Geerd Hamer shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. tgeorgescu (talk) 13:56, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Ryke Geerd Hamer. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. tgeorgescu (talk) 13:59, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Complementary and Alternative Medicine. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. tgeorgescu (talk) 13:55, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. tgeorgescu (talk) 13:55, 20 November 2021 (UTC)