Hello, I'm Hamish59. I noticed that you recently made an edit that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

Ways to improve Danien Bryant

edit

Hi, I'm Noiratsi. Dankuso126, thanks for creating Danien Bryant!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This page looks like is has some good and well-referenced content, but it doesn't have an introduction. I've tagged the page so someone might come and write one. There are guidelines at WP:LEAD if you want to write one yourself.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. —Preceding undated comment added 18:48, 4 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Do not create, add, or restore hoaxes to Wikipedia, such as you did with the article Danien Bryant. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please do not disrupt Wikipedia. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia to learn more about this project and how you can contribute constructively. Thank you. -gadfium 21:42, 6 December 2012 (UTC)Reply