Re: Reception edit

Hey there, Dan. I'm assuming you wrote these reviews, if not much of what follows still applies. No offense meant (is what someone says when they first practice to make offense) but you are not a lauded source for pay-per-view reception. Onus is partially on me for not going in-depth, but the events added are the only ones yet written, and the style guide makes it clear they should be from sources that are well-known with a reputation for their reviews. Your site is in its infancy at less than two months with an exiguous amount of followers and a WP:CONFLICT argument could be levied in using Wikipedia for promotion, regardless of intentions. Papacha (talk) 18:50, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Don't restore removed comments please. It's more a courtesy than a guideline but as a new user you don't have a firm grasp yet on either. You have a narrow, *very* base understanding of the site; I and any other editor have every right to cut such things and threatening "complaint procedures" as reprisal is a farce I welcome you to try. You are guilty of the same bulldozing entitlement you charge; I haven't tweaked anything of yours since our last chat minus your previous comments or your recent bit of self-importance you chose to visit upon my talk page. Kindly bugger off your soap box please & don't confuse being bold for "acting an over-dramatic turd". Take care. Papacha (talk) 00:24, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
So really this can't go anywhere else that's good. Looking through page history the edits you rolled from were old, hours before I recanted and said I could have handled the entire situation better, though you seem to have been following me I'll assume you missed it for both our sakes. In any case I believe you've SERIOUSLY misinterpreted me and think I bear you some ill-will or am on a power trip to censor you and have taken things on a direction they were never meant to go down. I'd ask that if you have any other questions concerning the matter you take it up with an admin per your earlier inclination when you thought cutting a comment was a worrisome thing; I promise no objections. Inquire of them proper policy and grow as a user, and should our paths cross again we'll each have a cool head & come to better understanding. Later. Papacha (talk) 00:31, 2 October 2012 (UTC)Reply