Hello there David, welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you ever need editing help visit Wikipedia:How does one edit a page or how to format them visit our manual of style. Experiment at Wikipedia:Sandbox. If you need pointers on how we title pages visit Wikipedia:Naming conventions. If you have any other questions about the project then check out Wikipedia:Help or add a question to the Village pump.
OK, so much for the standard new user greeting. I am looking forward to the contributions of Thailand you promised - quite a lot of the Thailand stuff we now have was written by me, but they need someone to check it, to enlarge it, or to add new topics I haven't found the time or mood or knowledge to add yet. One page which might be of special interest for you is the List of Thailand-related topics - with that one we can avoid to recreate pages several times with different romanized spellings, as well as keep track of what is changing. It'd be nice if you would add new pages you create or find to that list. If you have any questions you can always ask me of course. andy 11:52, 1 Mar 2004 (UTC)^^^
^^^ Hi David,
I just came across Wikipedia and have found it on the whole balanced in presentation. Unfortunately, I found the entry on anti-semitism http://www.fact-index.com/a/an/anti_semitism_1.html misleading and more harm than help. I have checked the procedure for criticizing articles, and found the talk page and your discussion, and as yours was the only email I could find, I'm turning to you for assistance.
I've written up a few criticisms (use of 19th c term for the age-old problem of anti-Jewish sentiment, no mention of the REAL sources of anti-Jewish sentiment, i.e., the racist and anti-Christian elements of the Talmud and the role of Jews in their host countries) if you are interested.
This unbalanced presentation of a very delicate issue feeds a dangerous misunderstanding of the role of Jews in their host societies at a time when the world is descending rapidly into world war prompted in the view of many authorities (including the likes of Finkelstein and Chomsky) by the actions of Israel.
It is telling that in other articles dealing with Jewish matters (Schneerson, anti-Zionism) the entries are qualified with "The neutrality of this article is disputed." Curiously the entry on anti-semitism is BOTH protected and free of this qualification, though I see there is at least some discussion going on the talk page. I'm not interested in engaging in online polemics, and I understand this issue is perhaps the most explosive in Wikipedia, but I see no reason why 'the other side' should not be fairly presented, even if the pro-Jewish POV gets the final word. Can you suggest how I could proceed? Thanks.
Eric Walberg eric@albatros.uz
A bowl of strawberries for you!
edit
|
Thank you for your great contributions in many topics. Do you mind helping us on this page as well? Thanks in advance :) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thai_cuisine Chutinonp |