Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Your recent contribution(s) to Wikipedia did not provide specific references or sources. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. Editors may choose to remove material you have contributed if it is not verifiable. Please provide specific references in your contributions to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content. You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Larry V (talk | e-mail) 07:18, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi, please don't label your edit summaries with things like "Here's Source" when you're not actually adding a source for your edits. It's misleading and some editors will likely interpret it as vandalism. | Mr. Darcytalk 23:41, 21 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Please. Stop. This is your last warning. If you continue to repeatedly insert unsourced and questionable material into articles without citing a reliable source, with or without misleading edit summaries such as you have been using, you will be blocked. Thank you, —bbatsell¿? 15:59, 23 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I have blocked you for 24 hours per this edit after you were repeatedly warned against adding unsourced information to the article. The fact that you are using misleading edit summaries like "sourced" was what pushed this one over the edge. I'd suggest you take the time you are not editing to read Wikipedia's policies on verifiability and reliable sources. You need to actually source this information before you add it to the article. Continuing to add this infomation to the article without a source is disruptive and will just earn you a longer block.--Isotope23 20:39, 24 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Sourced to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. →AzaToth 20:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I think what we mean is whenever you edit Wikipedia, you need to have a source to back up what you write. Say you find some info about the history of a subway system. All you need to do is create a link to the place you found it. THe easiest way is to put the web address in [ ] signs. and it makes something that looks like [1]. You can also check this page for more ways to source things. If you need more help, just put {{helpme}} on your page and someone will be there shortly. --wL<speak·check·chill> 20:25, 26 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
If you have a reliable source, such as a newspaper article, about the travels of the R68s, please cite it. Otherwise, the detailed breakdown of where the R68 was introduced first and what lines it was moved to should not be included, since it is not verifiable: someone reading the article cannot know whether it is correct. --NE2 20:26, 26 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
You cannot unprotect this page, since you are not a Wikipedia administrator. Removing the "protected" notice does not make the page unprotected. Larry V (talk | e-mail) 01:20, 27 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} .
Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as Sourced to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. →AzaToth 20:14, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
