June 2013

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for block evasion, as you did at Van Rensselaer (surname). If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Tiderolls 19:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

D12Blame (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I would like to be unblocked so i can continue to add factual information. A page I was working on has since been sabotaged http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Rensselaer_%28surname%29 D12Blame (talk) 16:32, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Request does not address reason for block -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:37, 4 June 2013 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of Martha Van Rensselaer Hall

edit
 

The article Martha Van Rensselaer Hall has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of significance.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TKK bark ! 00:07, 9 June 2013 (UTC)Reply