Duplicate images uploaded
editThanks for uploading Image:ChineseDetecor.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:ChineseDetector.JPG. The copy called Image:ChineseDetector.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.
This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 22:17, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
See alsos
editHi, I've noticed that you've been adding a lot of "see alsos" in articles. Many of these aren't related to the topic of the article in question. It might be better if you gave some justification as to why the articles you're "see also"ing have anything to do with HFGWs.
For example, the things you're talking about in the article are not even distantly related to the big bang, where I recently reverted your addition of a see also.
You might also consider that the HFGW article duplicates a lot of material in the gravitational wave article, and is might be more appropriate there (for example, the Big Bang makes GWs, not just HFGWs). The exception here is the "Applications" you talk about in the article, many of which seem somewhat dodgy (fusion or finding WMDs with gravitational waves? really?) wesino //t// 19:37, 10 May 2007 (UTC)
The deletion review you raised was incorrectly listed and ended up in the page boiler plate. I have therefore removed the text. You are very welcome to relist this properly. Reading what you say, remember that we are not here to report breaking news. You need to provide multiple independant reliable sources to allow us to verify the content. In this case this will mean peer reviewed articles in scientific journals. Spartaz Humbug! 07:22, 26 May 2007 (UTC) Nevermind I misread the instructions. Spartaz Humbug! 07:25, 26 May 2007 (UTC)