October 2009

edit

  Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with The End of the World (Event). Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Antipastor (talk) 06:13, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to The End of the World (Event). If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Ginsengbomb (talk) 06:14, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Stereotypes of highly committed wikipedia editors

edit
 

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. CardinalDan (talk) 06:51, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. CardinalDan (talk) 06:52, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Stereotypes of highly committed wikipedia editors

edit

I have nominated Stereotypes of highly committed wikipedia editors, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stereotypes of highly committed wikipedia editors. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Shadowjams (talk) 07:16, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Stereotypes of highly committed wikipedia editors

edit

appears to be an essay; it can be moved to your userspace (ie to User:Cromwell526/Stereotypes of highly committed wikipedia editors) if you wish to continue working on it, but it doesn't really fit in article space.   pablohablo. 10:08, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply