Contributor892z

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Contributor892z! Your additions to Wiener Börse have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 18:49, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

@Diannaa: not sure where the copyright violation is happening. I'm just writing the rules, in my own words. I can't change the rules... Contributor892z (talk) 18:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Some of the prose you added was a match for content in this document. — Diannaa (talk) 18:58, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

@Diannaa: the paragraph that you removed is just a list of prescribed steps. I doubt it was an exact match as I know I changed the wording. But it will obviously be similar if I'm describing a list of steps that are mandated in Austrian law to be followed in a precise specification. And I doubt that Austrian law is protected by copyright. Contributor892z (talk) 19:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

It was not an exact match but it was very close to content present in the document I mentioned, which is not issued by the Austrian government. Austrian law is not protected by copyright. Have you got a citation that shows the relevant Austrian law? The content you added was unsourced. — Diannaa (talk) 20:06, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

I have a link to the relevant Austrian law [1] but it is huge. Either way, I have added this reference to the page. Contributor892z (talk) 20:36, 1 May 2024 (UTC)