Clampton

Welcome!

Hello, Clampton, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  --Muchness 09:30, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Sondheim edits

Hi. Can't really figure out how to e-mail, so I'm trying this, from the instructions. Hey, BTW, you're nearby. I'm in Silver Spring. You know, I knew what I posted ended up looking way too POV. I was hoping someone could do something to even it out, or at least use some fragment as they saw fit to edit it. But, it could be it's best just removed. There's probably no way to get near this subject, which is odd. When a philosopher like Derrida got added to Wikipedia--in an article that was initially almost thoroughly ingorant of his philosophy and laced with some kind of superstitious hatred of him--it seemed to get worked out through a process of editing and counter-editing, though some harsh words were thrown around in the discussion. I took no part, just followed the transformation. With most major figures in the arts, one finds some balance of criticism--even though I agree that can't be the main thrust of an encyclopedia article. But this Sondheim article isn't just bio; it's sometimes just one step away from a fan site. It includes references to some individual works not having been well received, but as bio, I think it's enthusiastic to the point of crossing well into point of view--especially in the sentence that announces his "renown" as a lyricist, and one known for his ambiguity, wit, etc. I know that among theater buffs, there's a hands-off Sondheim rule, just as even the most vicious hockey players honored the hands-off Gretzky rule because his records were good for the game. But a -pedia bio of any sort needs to climb out of the confines of cultish chit-chat and place a subject of this sort in broader context. In the broader context of late 20th century humanities, Sondheim's lyrics can't reasonably be seen as even a jitter on the seismograph that measures contributions to the American language. If folk and pop singers do more with language to probe life, and even use the classical rhetorical devices of language more intelligently and nimbly, a worldwide, egalitairian, anyone-can-contribute, online encyclopedia should not present the nattering of a few folk who live on Central Park as bio, and exclude the divergent as POV. My posting didn't fit, I know, but something could have been extracted or substituted in order to temper the fervor with which Sondheim's renown, wit, and ambiguity as a lyricist were advertised yet not supported. Ticket sales are all that's necessary to support his bigness, but the arguments about his lyrical craftsmanship are not at all supported; my POV counterpoints were at least accompanied by example, brief or insufficient as it was. But I fear this is a bit hopeless. He is Sondheim, after all, official exception to the Bill of Rights. If they ever repeal the Patriot Act, I'm going to run outside and scream, "'Send in the Clowns' is not ambiguous; it's muddle-headed!!!"

Just some contextual points to ponder because you appear to be an interested and active Wiki editor.

Best,

Matt lakelachrymose@hotmail.com 151.200.44.162 12:06, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Edit Summary

{subst:uw-editsummary}} --Umalee 20:36, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Famous author?

Are you the famous author, credited with writing Gardens of Imagination and Flights of Fantasy?

Jeffz.name (talk) 02:06, 14 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm not sure about the "famous" part, but otherwise, yes, that would be me.

Clampton (talk) 05:18, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

I'm glad to confirm that. I've sent email to you via the email-this-user link. --- OtherDave (talk) 16:45, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Greetings,

On a similar note, I'm wondering if you ever authored any text adventure games for the Commodore 64?

Saltire sable (talk) 03:00, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

I didn't write any commercial text adventures. I did write a freeware text adventure for the C64 called "Starflight" (slightly before the EA game of the same name) that was available for download in several places and wrote a book aimed at young adult audiences on writing your own text adventures (How to Create Adventure Games - Franklin Watts, 1986).

Awesome! Starflight is the game I was thinking of. Pardon my absent-mindedness in taking such a ridiculously long time to remember to respond. I've sent you an email with a link that may interest you. Saltire sable (talk) 09:30, 10 January 2011 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Clampton.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:49, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Bell MT

Hey, i'm a big fan of your book "New Theory's On The Birth Of The Universe" and becoming a Wikipedia editor. do i have you'r acceptance to make a Wikipedia page on it? By the way i'm new, am i aloud to write on your wall?

(Bell MT (talk) 02:18, 25 November 2015 (UTC))

Yeah, feel free to write on my wall. Also, feel free to write articles on any of my books or on me, since last I checked there wasn't an article about me. This clearly should be remedied. ;) Clampton (talk) 13:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Hey, i'm back! I way going to read "New Theories on the Dinosaurs" but, the only place I could find it was at my school library and school is over. I am a big fan of your's and am wondering if you will write anymore books. I know that you are busy with your blogs though. I also have another question, what do you think about the NSA and Edward Snowdin? Thanks

-Bell MT (Sam)

A barnstar for you!

	The Writer's Barnstar
	You are awesome Bell MT (talk) 18:16, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Clampton. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Clampton. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Clampton. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kimberly Guilfoyle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Happily Ever After. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 26 August 2020 (UTC)