Circuscision Defence

• I have reverted your edit to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Joe Circus/Archive. Please do not edit archives directly. I've also blocked this account as you are admitting being a sock puppet of another account in that edit. If you want to appeal your block, log into your original account, and follow the directions at WP:GAB. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 16:40, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

Dennis, please help! by login to my original account to you mean the one that was blocked or you mean logging to the account I am being accused of being a suck_puppet of ? --Circuscision Defence (talk) 17:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

I mean your original account. The first one you created at Wikipedia. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 17:07, 11 July 2013 (UTC)

I tried to reset the password and it is saying:

Internal error Jump to: navigation, search

Your IP address is blocked from editing, and so is not allowed to use the password recovery function to prevent abuse.

Return to Main Page.

Here is the result of your original suggestion:

Hello Circuscision,

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that either the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you have been blocked for, will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and will make useful contributions instead.

Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information.

Fluffernutter English Wikipedia Administrator

I feel like I am running in circles, did you read my comment about being incorrectly profiled. How can I defend myself against an accusation of being someone I am not?

I have also read this just now: " If you are improperly blocked for sockpuppetry, you should realize that it may not always be easy or even possible to correct the situation."

If for a brief minute you could put yourself in my shoes and give me the benefit of a doubt: If I am not lying, can you imagine what I am having to go thru? this is so unjust that I feel like just running away and never commenting or editing anything. It is even worst when you think about how many people might have been blocked and comments might have been censured in the last few years just for posting negative feedback after being outraged by how biased and apologetic that article has become. Do you realize that some editors of that article might have been playing the system and doing this for a long time? Denouncing people who disagree with them (even on the talk page) as a "well known" socket puppets quacking and effectively hushing their voices. Thanks for attempting to help, but you just seem to be bringing down the hammer on me, so far 3 people out of 3 people who have not "Remembered to assume good faith" --Circuscision Defence (talk) 17:32, 11 July 2013 (UTC)