Chuksha
First Edit
editHi Chuksha, Good first edit, but I was a bit confused by your referencing. You added a reference: is the source you cited one that introduces the term "hereditary prosopagnosia" only? Or does that source also contain the info about the study that was conducted? If so, then the reference could go at the end of the material you've written; if not, then you need to provide a source for the study you discuss. --Greentina (talk) 01:54, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Hi Tina,
Just changed the referencing to the end of my material as the study is from that source! cheers,
Invitation to Vancouver meetup
editHello,
You are invited to an edit-a-thon at the Prophouse Café on Sunday March 25, as part of Women's History Month events all over the world. If you wish to attend, please see Wikipedia:Meetup/Vancouver WikiWomen's Edit-a-Thon and add your signature to the list.
Thank you! InverseHypercube (talk) 10:04, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
Outline?
editChuksha, Where's the outline of your Kenney Dam article indicating what section you will be writing? It should be on your User Page. --Greentina (talk) 03:55, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Hey Tina,
I totally thought we were suppose to just post our outlines on one person's user page and than connect them with 'My watchlist'.
Here's our confirmed outline:
Introduction [header section - includes some of the background already there] 1.0 History 1.1 Selection of the dam site [including Alcan’s motivation, agreements with province] 1.2 Dam construction [including technical specifications, land area flooded, non-native displacement] 1.3 Creation of Kitimat
2.0 Aboriginal impacts 2.1 Relocation of the Cheslatta T’En 2.2 Subsequent legal action
3.0 Environmental impacts 3.1 Impact on fisheries
4.0 Economic impacts 4.1 Energy exports
5.0 Kemano Completion Project
I will be writing about the Aboriginal Impacts of the Dam. Chuksha (talk) 04:43, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use File:Kenney Dam, 2010.jpg
editThanks for uploading File:Kenney Dam, 2010.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 01:15, 7 April 2012 (UTC)