Linda Kaplan Thaler

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Linda Kaplan Thaler, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.girlscoutsnyc.com/~gscgny/webmaster/Website/SUPPORT%20GSCGNY/lindakaplanthaler.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:58, 25 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Linda Kaplan Thaler

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Linda Kaplan Thaler requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. PranksterTurtle (talk) 19:18, 7 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Linda Kaplan Thaler

edit

Yes, I'm the one who nominated your article for speedy deletion, but I didn't actually delete it -- admins are the one who make the final call. To retrieve a copy of your article, please contact one of the admins on this list. One of them should be able to help you out.

To avoid further copyright problems, if you have access to the page in question the quickest route is to post a notice on the page saying that you release the text under the GFDL, into the public domain, or under a suitable Creative Commons license (Attribution or Attribution-ShareAlike work fine, just not the ones that say Noncommercial). You could also send an email from an address associated with the original page to permissions-en at wikimedia dot org saying that you release it under the GFDL or into the public domain. Just be sure to note that you have done so in the talk page of the article.

For more information, please see the policy for releasing your own work for use in Wikipedia.

Also, while editing or creating articles about people that you are closely associated with isn't forbidden, it's discouraged. Please see the conflict of interest policy for more information. If you have any other questions, feel free to drop me a message on my talk page. – PranksterTurtle (talk) 18:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Linda kaplan thaler

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Linda kaplan thaler, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.girlscoutsnyc.com/~gscgny/webmaster/Website/SUPPORT%20GSCGNY/lindakaplanthaler.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:16, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Process for confirmation of permission

edit

Due to the near impossibility of confirming the identity of owner of a Wikipedia account and the potential for impersonation and false claims of permission, it is not sufficient to place a claim of ownership on an article talk page when providing permission. Instead please see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for the process of providing Wikipedia permission to use copyrighted text you own. You will need to complete the appropriate parts of the When permission is confirmed section to allow the Wikimedia Foundation to verify your identity and log permission to use the text. --Allen3 talk 23:35, 27 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of File:LindaKaplanThaler.jpg

edit
 

The file File:LindaKaplanThaler.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 25 January 2020 (UTC)Reply