Welcome!

Hello, Chris874664, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Doc Quintana (talk) 03:54, 11 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hey, Chris! Some individual entries of the TWA destinations still don't have individual references. AFAIK every destination that was cancelled prior to the disestablishment of TWA needs a ref.

Thank you for working on the article! WhisperToMe (talk) 21:15, 16 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

In the destination list articles themselves, we don't post timetable images to them. As for how to cite old timetables, I'm not sure how to do that. I would ask Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airlines about how to do so WhisperToMe (talk) 18:45, 17 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Well, a lot of the old timetables that I used as refs are broken. Lemme see if web.archive.org had archived them. If it did, it'll help answer some questions... WhisperToMe (talk) 06:27, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Oh, Tampa/St. Pete does appear in http://web.archive.org/web/20070408181551/http://www.airchive.com/Timetables+and+Maps/Pan+Am+Compressed/PAmap9110.jpg - I'm not sure exactly what airport it is... WhisperToMe (talk) 06:29, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

After consulting http://web.archive.org/web/20070408181551/http://www.airchive.com/Timetables+and+Maps/Pan+Am+Compressed/PAmap9110.jpg I removed the five south American countries that weren't on there. You can go ahead and add more destinations, as long as they are cited :) - I don't own the timetable page. I'm just another editor. WhisperToMe (talk) 06:34, 11 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Yes, cargo only destinations can be included too :) WhisperToMe (talk) 01:30, 12 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Pan Am destinations

edit

Hi Chris!!

First and foremost I must tell you that my intention is not to create a conflict, but an anonymous user removed destinations to which Pan Am if operated, as is the case of Ecuador, Peru, Uruguay, among others. Besides the anonymous user, with editions also makes it not clear whether or not the airline ceased operations.

Without further ado, I leave keeping in touch ...--Juancho 1000 (talk) 19:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Genetic Internet

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Genetic Internet requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Enti342 MEMO 03:34, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Hereditary Networks

edit

Hello Chris874664,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hereditary Networks for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Into The Fray T/C 04:24, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Hereditary Internet

edit

Hello Chris874664,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Hereditary Internet for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Into The Fray T/C 04:27, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Genetically Engineered Information

edit

Hello Chris874664,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Genetically Engineered Information for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Into The Fray T/C 04:29, 4 July 2015 (UTC)Reply