Knockover on Planet Zi edit

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Knockover on Planet Zi, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.angelfire.com/pro/zoids_fuzors/episode_guide/episode1.htm. As a copyright violation, Knockover on Planet Zi appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Knockover on Planet Zi has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Knockover on Planet Zi. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Knockover on Planet Zi, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. —Keakealani 06:41, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello! Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles you have created. If you feel that the article should not be deleted, instead place {{hangon}} under the speedy tag. This notifies the reviewing admin that you are planning on changing the article or justifying the article on its talk page. Thanks for your contributions, but please do not make misleading edits like this. —Keakealani 20:42, 29 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Prelude HC edit

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Prelude HC, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 02:31, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Akatsuki edit

Hi - I don't think you'd really have a notable series that didn't have any third-party sources. The problem with the Akatsuki article is that though Naruto is obviously notable, some parts of it may struggle to be covered. And, of course, we can't make exceptions with the guidelines we use for our articles (mainly verifiability, notability and sources), or else we'd just get submerged in trivial articles. ELIMINATORJR 09:53, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

List of Gantz episodes edit

 

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article List of Gantz episodes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 23:48, 9 January 2008 (UTC)Reply