Cheylesmore1

Mark Haysom

I've noticed you've reverted the edits I made to the Mark Haysom article. I'm inclined to revert what you've done, but I really don't want to get into an edit war with you. I've got a strong feeling that you're probably Mark Haysom himself (Cheylesmore is a bit of a giveaway) so there might be a conflict of interest, but of course I don't know that, so I'm going to put that too one side. (You may not have seen what I wrote at Talk:Mark Haysom.)

But I'm going to try and be helpful. I urge you to read the fundamental principles of Wikipedia. Morever I recommend you read the policy about biographical articles on Wikipedia. The particularly relevant section is that information must be verifiable. That means that needs to be some sort of sources stated. If it can't be, that it should be removed. That's what I did when I edited the article to create the version on 25 October 2018. I believe that the notability of Mark Haysom for inclusion in Wikipedia has more to do with his journalism and management career rather than his writing career.

As you only edited the article three days ago, I'm going to assume good faith (another Wikipedia policy) and give you some time to add in some references before considering whether I edit the article again.Seaweed (talk) 20:18, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

February 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yunshui ^雲_水 11:10, 4 February 2019 (UTC)