License tagging for Image:Ownage.jpg edit

Thanks for uploading Image:Ownage.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 19:10, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

June 2007 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Kenya, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JayHenry 13:56, 26 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

September 2007 edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Slave Trade Act 1807. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BrainyBabe 20:35, 29 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

November 2007 edit

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Ashdown Forest, you will be blocked from editing. --RedHillian (talk) 15:07, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 20:51, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cheokho (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please may i request to be unblocked as the above pages which relate to "ChiG" were not in anyway created by me, but by another user which may have caused an understanding. Thank you and I hope you may accept my request

Decline reason:

Not according to the deletion logs as regards "ChiG 2". Declined. —Jeremy (v^_^v Dittobori) 21:03, 18 March 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.