June 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm JJMC89. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to McKeown— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:42, 26 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at McKeown with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to McKeown with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:56, 26 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to McKeown. — JJMC89(T·C) 02:59, 26 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Katietalk 03:07, 26 June 2016 (UTC)Reply