Reincarnation

edit

thankyou Chebyshev! I will be more careful how i express numbers in future. i see that The cycle of death and rebirth goes on, even here on wikipedia. do try to keep the profanity in check though.Benny the wayfarer (talk) 19:57, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cheers Benny, the 'guide to formatting numbers' isn't the most exciting reading, but it's nice to have everything look consistent. Sorry if i was sarcastic about it Chebyshev (talk) 21:59, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

2C-B and "paradoxical" reactions

edit

Thanks for your edit on 2C-B. For the record, though, in pharmacology a paradoxical reaction is simply a reaction opposite to the drug's expected effect. Whoever wrote the sentence wasn't quite using the term properly, but I believe that was the intended definition - not the implication of a logical "paradox." Cheers! St3vo (talk) 23:53, 17 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks a lot for your help, and for taking the time to inform me. Chebyshev (talk) 21:57, 18 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

March 2008

edit

  Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors. Your Edit Summaries, in particular, should demonstrate more Wikipedia:Civility. Thank you.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 01:26, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

April 2008

edit

  Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia.   — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 18:19, 3 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing.

161.225.129.111 (talk) 19:23, 12 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Battle of France

edit

Hi

I have reverted your edits on this article. Air superiority and Air Supremacy are not the same thing, and air superiority is not defined in the air Supremacy page or vice-versa (there are two seperate articles). This was what was being pointed out in the article. Dapi89 (talk) 14:54, 6 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

No. If you believe that you are the fool. You are a venomous cretin aren't you? If I were you I would address your attitude toward people that give you the courtesy of a response. You will find it is not welcome on wikipedia. Dapi89 (talk) 22:56, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

By the way, nasty uneducated lying fools don't stay calm in the face of abuse and only a uneducated lying fool would throw insults at another editor. I'm reporting you. Dapi89 (talk) 23:00, 7 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I would like to know what is psychologically wrong with you. It seems that there must be a medical condition that compels you to behave in this way. I suggest you invest in a shrink. Looking at your history, you have done this to other editors so you are prolific. Your language reads like a child not mine. Your incapable of being civil and using any other language, other than profantiy, as a means of expression. Who is the uneducated twelve year old child now? Dapi89 (talk) 10:11, 9 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Edit summaries

edit

Your edit summaries are incredibly uncivil and it seems you have been given warnings regarding uncivil editing before. If you post another edit summary similar to this, this, or this, I will block your account indefinitely.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:35, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

      • Close to 100 constructive edits, and no disruptive or unhelpful edits to the Wikipedia namespace, yet again I am chased away for my insufficiently subservient attitude on talk pages and the like. Chebyshev (talk) 00:33, 15 May 2008 (UTC)Reply