Charlottecopeman

Brightcove

It was deleted as SPAM by five different admins before finally being protected from further recreation. My name is on it simply because I converted it from one type of protection to another. I'm not one of the five. I can list the five deleting admins out for you if you would like to discuss with any of them the actual deletion/protection descisions. As for editing about where you work, check out WP:COI for why this, while not prohibited, is generally a bad idea. - TexasAndroid 19:56, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

October 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Like has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=167480643262293.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:58, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Stu Francis

Hello, Charlottecopeman. I have reverted your edit to this page because:

• Most modern songwriters and poets have not released their works under an open content license and therefore their inclusion in Wikipedia violates their copyright. Copyright usually expires 70 years after the author's death.
• In addition to the main point of not violating copyright, do not write an article that consists only of lyrics. This would be considered a primary source. It may if it is GFDL-compatible free content, be transwikied to Wikisource, but it could also be speedy deleted by an admin for lack of context.

In a simple view, song pages do not consist of lyrcis and should not. Thank you. --Anirudh Emani (talk) 09:46, 13 October 2011 (UTC)