Reply

edit

Well, I obviously disagree with you that they "went beyond their rights", but that's my opinion. "there is nothing to prove such a thing they implied"; of course there isn't; they were expressing their personal OPINIONS, which is perfectly acceptable. Just because JM is a candidate doesn't mean people can't express their opinions about him. I highly doubt anyone would be able to bring a case over this being 'libel' (slander is spoken, libel is written) as it is clearly an expressed opinion and not a malicious statement of fact (not to mention it's a JOKE on a COMEDY show).

Anyway, did you look through the Criticism of Family Guy article? There's tons of criticisms in there. If you can find a reliable source suggesting the same thing as you (somehow I doubt you will be able to), by all means, add something to an article. Nobody's stopping you!
Finally, I'm not sure what you were implying by calling me a "well placed supporter"; you asked a question in a public place and I felt inclined to answer.

BTW:
  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. Dp76764 (talk) 17:56, 21 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

September 2011

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Cheers, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.