Cbartho
September 2011
edit
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jim Peacock, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Jim Peacock was changed by Cbartho (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.930562 on 2011-09-29T17:31:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:31, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Japanese language with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Geoff Who, me? 17:34, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Dalai Lama, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Dalai Lama was changed by Cbartho (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.8526 on 2011-09-30T12:32:32+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 12:32, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Frigotoni ...i'm here; 12:33, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:37, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
Cbartho (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Dear Administrator, I have just gotten back on my Wikipedia page after a few months and I have found that it has been blocked from editing. When I noticed this I was aghast and I am not sure when this may have occurred. I also believe that my account has been possibly breached and I will change the password. If you do unblock this account than I will use it according to the standards set by Wikipedia. Thank you very much.
Decline reason:
Unfortunately by claiming your account is compromised, you have guaranteed that it will never be unblocked, our policy states that hacked accounts are to be blocked permanantly Jac16888 Talk 13:09, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Cbartho (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
GO SUCK A DICK Jac16888i like pizza 14:03, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Talk page access revoked. WilliamH (talk) 14:09, 6 December 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.