Carpo- Rusyn

October 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gary Hart has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gary Hart was changed by Carpo- Rusyn (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.864833 on 2014-10-10T11:31:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:31, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Gary Hart may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• t care. I'm serious. If anybody wants to put a tail on me, go ahead. They'll be very bored." <ref>{{cite web
• http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tUB_tRLU4Gk</ref

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:48, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Please read about WP:Edit wars

I'm sorry if you felt the boilerplate warning User:Jytdog left you was "insulting", but your edits at Gary Hart do indeed seem to violate our three-revert rule. There is a significant probability that you will be blocked if you continue. Could you please go to the relevant talk page section to voice your opinion?

Best wishes for peaceful editing, FourViolas (talk) 21:04, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Jytdog (talk) 21:10, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

link to section is here Jytdog (talk) 21:30, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

note - your response on the edit-warring notice board shows that you don't understand what is happening. 3RR is a behavior issue. Disputes about content happen in Wikipedia all the time, but it is a foundational, ground rule, that we try to resolve disputes by talking about them on the Talk page, in good faith and based on policies and guidelines. You are not behaving that way. That is the problem. All you talked about on the noticeboard was your view on the content dispute. They don't care about content on that board. They just look at behavior. Jytdog (talk) 22:57, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Edit warring at Gary Hart

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 04:26, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

• Please note that due to your behavioral similarities with the previously disruptive IPs and single purpose nature, if you continue to be disruptive after this block expires, your next block will be much, much longer. Kevin Gorman (talk) 11:51, 26 November 2014 (UTC)