User talk:Carolinecrocker/sandbox

Caroline's Peer Review

• The lead section of the article is easy to understand, however, it could possibly be improved with the addition of more information so people can get a fuller understanding of the topic before reading further in the article.
• The article is very well organized. I like how it starts with the geography of the Brazos River itself, and how it transitions into history and later the cultural significance.
• The article is well balanced throughout. Large topics of significance, such as the geography and history of the river, have more information than the other sections, however, this is expected because these are the most important sections.
• The content is neutral and there is no bias throughout.
• Sources seem reliable.

Caroline's Peer Review

I like how you decided to correct some of the grammar and factual information in the article already... You did a great job outlining your information in the sandbox to ensure easy transfer into the article itself... Nice job utilizing the Baylor Digital Archives and ensuring that you cited all sources... It seems like you are able to make a large contribution to the article as a whole for the community — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikkivacca (talk • contribs) 22:21, 27 November 2018 (UTC)