Welcome!

Hello, Caelifer~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --Nlu (talk) 16:06, 8 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

 

The article The Latter Five Poets of the Southern Garden has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

As it stands, it is literally just a list. A list of 5 things, 2 of which don't even have articles.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. daTheisen(talk) 18:26, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of The Latter Five Poets of the Southern Garden

edit

I have nominated The Latter Five Poets of the Southern Garden, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Latter Five Poets of the Southern Garden. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. daTheisen(talk) 10:14, 4 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • Wanted to let you know, per improvements from another editor addressing all concerns, I've withdrawn and closed the nomination as non-admin close, withdrawn by nominator without any non-dissenting opinions. I hope you don't hold it against me too much for this all, but I do feel really relieved if I can early close as keep any XfDs I open. It means people care about the article and will watch it, and I can think of only 1 in 5 I've submitted where there was no response at the request for improvements and result was delete. 2 were speedy keep per me upon improvements, other 2 were keep but weren't eligible for non-admin close since there were dissenting opinions (even 1 is too many, I was told). Thanks for your time on this, and being more proof that most anything can be resolved without possible blunt end consequences if people actually attempt to talk about it personally and on the XfD page itself.  :) daTheisen(talk) 16:39, 7 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Your account will be renamed

edit

22:46, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed

edit

11:20, 22 April 2015 (UTC)