Eye-stabbing edit

 

A tag has been placed on Eye-stabbing, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Eagles 24/7 (C) 03:22, 22 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sock puppet edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet. (blocked by –MuZemike 00:24, 23 January 2010 (UTC))Reply
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CabbageBrain (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

the user you are trying to apprehend is not connected to any sockpuppetier

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    • understand what you have been blocked for,
    • will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    • will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. TNXMan 16:14, 24 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Thanks for understanding. :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CabbageBrain (talkcontribs) 15:17, 24 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

CabbageBrain (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I promise that I will make productive edits instead of making useless redirects and I will not resume the usage of the other accounts

Decline reason:

Request apparently withdrawn. Of course that doesn't mean you should go creating more accounts. -- zzuuzz (talk) 12:11, 27 January 2010 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Also, please retire all of the other sockpuppetry accounts so that this one will be the only one existing. I will never use them again. CabbageBrain (talk) 17:33, 25 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

They are: User:Gigogag, User:Abadaba123456789, User:Ipownfroobs, and User:Bdfjhkgj (correct me if I spelled the last one wrong). CabbageBrain (talk) 01:44, 27 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Last Message From User:CabbageBrain edit

Also, please retire this one as well. I'll put the notice on my talk page, but the well-deserved block prefents me from putting it on my user page itself, so that's where your job comes in. Thank you, and although my relationship with Wikipedia as an editor was tempestuous, I still believe in Wikipedia. Goodbye, Wikipedia!!! CabbageBrain (talk) 01:44, 27 January 2010 (UTC)Reply