CME46

George Bugaj

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. This is a non-notable biography according to criteria set out in WP:BIO.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  22:38, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

TV-holic

Hello! This is a slang term and Wikipedia is not a dictionary of slang. Your article also contains several unsourced statements about the beliefs of unspecified officials, making this article useless for a researcher. Can you cite the references from which these assertions are drawn, please? This will make your article useful for a researcher interested in television-watching habits. Please also note that this article was previously-deleted in December 2005 as a neologism, so rapid improvement would be an advantage if you want to keep it on Wikipedia.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  15:25, 8 June 2006 (UTC)

Kimberly Leach

Thanks for correcting the date (usually I'm really not that bad in maths) Optimale ^Gu 16:59, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

Roads in Pittsburgh

I am taking the liberty of tidying up your articles. Please check what I've done and that I haven't distorted your meaning. Keep up the good work.--Runcorn 07:27, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

54C (Pittsburgh)

54C (Pittsburgh) has been proposed for deletion. An editor felt the subject might not be notable enough for an article. Please review Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability for the relevant concerns. An example of notability guidelines can be found at Wikipedia:Notability (websites). If you can improve the article to address these concerns, please do so.

If no one objects to the deletion within five days by removing the "prod" notice, the article may be deleted without further discussion. If you remove the prod notice, the deletion process will stop, but if an editor is still not satisfied that the article meets Wikipedia guidelines, it may be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion for consensus. NickelShoe (Talk) 15:47, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Epperson.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Epperson.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 23:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Strangerer (Talk) 23:01, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

Do not post your password on Wikipedia

Do not post your password on Wikipedia

John Mackey

You appear to be the creator of the article John Mackey (mathematician). I have just nominated it as an article for deletion, as the subject seems not to satisfy the criteria for inclusion (in fact I am surprised it has not been challenged before). Simplifix (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Kimberly Leach

I have nominated Kimberly Leach, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Leach. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Niteshift36 (talk) 18:40, 27 June 2009 (UTC)

"四" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect 四. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 19#四 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Aasim (talk) 21:32, 19 October 2020 (UTC)