Archive 165Archive 170Archive 171Archive 172Archive 173Archive 174Archive 175

Reversion on Manisha Panchakam, warning given to new editor

Hi, I'm not entirely clear why you have reverted a new editor, Avdmoh, on this article, and further have given him a level 3 warning. The editor made these changes, which while uncited appear to me to be correct and by intention purely constructive. The reversion could be justified on the grounds that a citation might have been advisable, but in truth, the meaning of the material has not changed and for constructive copy-edits and small explanations, I'd not have thought any citation necessary. If I'm even half correct about that, the warning would seem to be inappropriate. I wonder what your thoughts are on the matter? We are in danger of losing a useful editor; he needs encouragement to learn to use sources, and will then be a valuable contributor. All the best, Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:51, 16 February 2020 (UTC)