March 2020 edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 20:23, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at SpongeBob SquarePants (season 2). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. AussieLegend () 00:06, 31 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

The research I've done is supported by TV recordings I've acquired of some of the original broadcasts. The commercials aired during the broadcasts provide a very clear indication of when they were recorded, in addition to Nickelodeon's "NEW!" bug appearing during one of them. I think we can all agree that recordings of the actual broadcasts are as legitimate as it can get, so if there's any way you'd like to suggest that I can prove their legitimacy while respecting the obvious copyrights of the material, I'd be more than happy to provide said proof.

I have dedicated the last several years to studying and researching Nickelodeon's broadcasts, and I am completely confident in my claims that the air dates I've brought into question are incorrect. I am not seeking to fight or argue with Wikipedia. My goal as a collector and archivist has always been to help ensure that accurate information is always available. Please let me know how I may provide proof of the legitimacy of my claims, and I will happily do so. CDCB123 (talk) 00:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)Reply