This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Busybest (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have done absolutely nothing wrong whatsoever. Please feel free to check my contributions and you will see that they are all legitimate

Decline reason:

Reviewing your contributions, I did not find any legitimate edits. It seems clear that you are only here to troll; unblock declined. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:31, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User:Nick has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 12:02, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

In answer to that question, BLOCKS always show up in the BLOCK log - the normal logs are to give details of account creation. Busybest 12:33, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
IF you know so much, why are you a troll? - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 12:35, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
I've protected this talk page indefinitely- somehow, I feel sure that you know what that means. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:37, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Reply