BustaJust
Thanks for your note. The overarching reason for deleting the page is that it was not written in an encyclopedic tone but rather as an advertisement. For example it was written in the first person ("We work with...") and contains too much self-promotional wording. Your company may well merit an article in Wikipedia but it has to be written in an encyclopedic manner. A good rule of thumb is that PR material -- indeed, any materials written by anyone in your PR department -- will be unsuitable for Wikipedia. Best to have the article written by someone in your technical department who does not instinctively use PR-type language. Please see guidelines for businesses interested in Wikipedia given here where you will find advice on how to construct a suitable article (see especially the last section of that page). Again, thanks for your interest and let me know if you have other questions. Raymond Arritt 13:21, 19 September 2007 (UTC)
Raymond-
I have updated the page and have had it re-written. Please let me know if this is now ok, or if there are some changes you would like to see made. Thank again for you help and time.
26 September edit
Notes have been left on talk page of Liquid Agency. Onnaghar talk ! ctrb 16:45, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
The file File:Liquid Agency Logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 11:10, 3 January 2019 (UTC)