Buchana4

Multiple accounts?

I can't help but notice that the wording of the edit comment(s) and changes you made to Serial killer are very similar to those used by other accounts with very few edits to Wikipedia that have edited that particular article in the last day or so. Please be aware of the WP:SOCKPUPPET rules, and if you have been using more than one account, please consider stopping the use of all but one of them. If instead you are working with a bunch of friends, please be aware that this can alxo be a problem. DreamGuy (talk) 22:09, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

McGrain v. Daugherty

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of McGrain v. Daugherty, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.mchughwatch.com/Supreme_Court/Mcgrain-v-Daugherty.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:57, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with McGrain v. Daugherty

Hello. Concerning your contribution, McGrain v. Daugherty, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.mchughwatch.com/Supreme_Court/Mcgrain-v-Daugherty.htm. As a copyright violation, McGrain v. Daugherty appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. McGrain v. Daugherty has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:McGrain v. Daugherty and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:McGrain v. Daugherty with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:McGrain v. Daugherty.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 23:04, 21 May 2010 (UTC)