.

March 2016 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Bognor Regis has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Bognor Regis was changed by BubBog (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964627 on 2016-03-20T20:17:24+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:17, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bognor Regis with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 20:18, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Bognor Regis with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. KylieTastic (talk) 20:20, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:22, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BubBog (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The person that has blocked me is either working for, or supporting Bognor Regis Town Council. Please free to investigate. BubBog (talk) 20:24, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

attacking one of our longest-serving and hardest-working admins is not going to get you unblocked.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 20:29, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.   —SMALLJIM  20:41, 20 March 2016 (UTC)Reply