Bstanard98

Welcome!

Hello, Bstanard98, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Kings Dominion have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome.  McDoobAU93 12:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

February 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Kings Dominion. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. McDoobAU93 13:23, 23 February 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kings Dominion, you may be blocked from editing. The information you are adding is incorrect. Please stop. -- McDoobAU93 13:07, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

March 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kings Dominion. McDoobAU93 11:16, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Kings Dominion shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please discuss your changes with other editors (such as McDoobAU93) on the talk page in order to gain consensus, before editing. -- Luk ^talk 13:23, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:38, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Paramount Parks

Hi, regarding your changes to Kings Dominion here, Paramount Parks sold the park in 2006 and is now run by Cedar Fair - you can read more about this here. If you disagree, please join the discussion on the article talk page here Talk:Kings Dominion#Ownership, name etc. Nil Einne (talk) 18:54, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

It's not a matter for discussion. These edits appear to be deliberate vandalism. This editor has been asked multiple times to discuss these changes, to stop making unsourced edits, and to stop engaging in an edit war. Look at the multiple warnings above. Perhaps it's time for a block.—JlACEer (talk) 14:18, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

Bstanard98, your recent changes to Kings Dominion have been reverted, as they introduced incorrect information into the article. Please visit Talk:Kings Dominion#Ownership, name etc to discuss your proposed changes before attempting to edit the article any further. If this behavior continues without discussion, it may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --GoneIn60 (talk) 22:54, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

April 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 12:56, 6 April 2018 (UTC)