This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BrvHeart (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Blocked unfairly by a notorious corrupt vandalizing sock/meatpuppeting admin Nandesuka, who is a puppet vandal who falsifies evidence to accuse and wrongfully block countless innocent users like myself.

Decline reason:

It is obvious that you are another sockpuppet of a user who has edited disruptively in the past. May I give you a word of advice? There is nothing in particular wrong with your sexual fetish for barefooted women in peril; it is a harmless and rather sweet fetish, and it is not hard for me to see its appeal. However, you need to confine your sex life to your private life; Wikipedia does not wish to be part of your sex life. Just create a nice www.barefootwomeninperil.com fan site, where you can post all the pictures and stories you want, and will almost certainly be able to find a community of people who share your interest. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:11, 16 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Message from notorious corrupt vandalizing sock/meatpuppeting admin Nandesuka

edit

Have we met before? What username were you using the last time I blocked you?

I'm happy to talk about your problem and the best way to resolve it. You don't have to stay blocked. But you do have to behave appropriately while you're here. Let me know if you want to chat. Nandesuka (talk) 19:57, 17 August 2008 (UTC)Reply