User talk:Brookie/Archive 7

RE: SO AND HONEYROOT

re So and Honeyroot:

And more ranting - be bold and edit the article as you feel fit! Ranting in dark corners doesn't help! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 09:31, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

FYI Courduroy - their entry was (until i put in info about boys wonder: Corduroy (band)

Corduroy were a 4-piece acid jazz outfit based in London, Corduroy released three eclectic albums on Acid Jazz Records and then moved over to Big Cat Records. Several singles from their 1993 album High Havok charted in the U.K. Top Ten. (they've never had a top ten hit in the main chart, and I wonder like So/Honeyroot had this had a nob box left on it too???)195.166.17.214 14:32, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

An Inquiry

Hi, I am wiriting to inquire concerning the picture of Cambridge Seven that you uploaded about a year or so ago. First, do you know the author or source of this picture? And secondly, what is the reason for this picture being released into the public domain (cuz the copyright tag there is obsolete)?

I ask all these since I uploaded this picture to the Chinesse Wikipedia yesterday and it is now being chanllenged (and is under the voting process) for deletion due to unkonwn source and unclear copyright status. Therefore I want to ask you for your kind assistance to provide the information if you happen to have it. I think the copyright status is a greater concern to the adminstrators of the Chinese Wikipedia since copyright laws in some Asian countries are not the same as in the US. Thank you for your gracious contribution of this picture and wish you have a wonderful and enjoyable vacation! --Will (Talk) 03:15, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

Sorry for the delay - hols! Have updated the picture details. it is an 1885 phot and so will be pd now. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 10:45, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks alot for the update! --Will 14:24, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

Other

Hi Brookie, I wonder if you can assist? I have just recieved a telephone call (on our consumer advice line)from a chap pretending to be contacting me from Wikipedia.co.uk and complaining because I have twice removed his link spam from a category.

He said and I quote "you are preventing me from doing my work so stop removing my links" Incredulous I know! I informed him that the links had been removed because he is simply spamming on behalf of a commercial IVA lead finding company. He has since continued to add the links and I have removed them but I am assuming that there must exist an easier method of stemming such activity?

The pages in question are below:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Individual_Voluntary_Arrangement http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bankruptcy_in_the_United_Kingdom

Sorry to trouble you but you have been helpful in the past so I thought I would ask.

Many thanks

Sean

Sorry to hear about this. I would post the details on the Administrators' Noticeboard and formally ask for some help there - I will have a look by the pages as well. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 16:11, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!

The Wikipedia Birthday Committee wishes you a very happy birthday! Enjoy your special day.

Jrcog@^{Insert something here} 01:51, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Wishing you all the best on your birthday! From the Wikipedia Birthday Committee.

SWAdair 06:08, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Just a happy Birthday message to you, Brookie/Archive 7, from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee!!! Have a great day!

Me too! --Thelb⁴ 19:47, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks chaps! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 18:34, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Clifton College

The Dexters House hoaxers are back again, can you protect the page please?? --TheM62Manchester 12:02, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

Will do Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 12:41, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

SO Not-Notability

What exactly is your objection re: notability to So (band)? That they had only one album, one moderate hit single? They were not a huge act, but they did have a radio single in the US in the 80s.

As for notability, what's your threshold? They were releasing music on a major label, after all, not just making CDs on their home PCs like folks can do now.Taniwha 16:12, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

They don't sound notable to me - quite the opposite in fact: and as you detail their mediocraty above! Also - please sign your edits. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 15:08, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

First, it's "Mediocrity" you meant to type. Second, the fact that their US album as a sideproject didn't break gold, but had a radio single, hardly makes it 'mediocre'. The album was successful enough to be in the top 40 during its release in the US charts.

There are plenty of bands without big hits, or one-hit-wonders who get pages on Wikipedia. There are also plenty of non-notable artists who haven't exactly changed the face of music, who continue to have pages on Wikipedia. I'm really just asking if you track 'em all down and question their notability on their pages. If you're looking to remove artists who had record contracts but were not notable, you must be very busy.

Let's see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shoes_%28band%29 (band who had no big singles but were on the first day of MTV)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moev (canadian industrial act)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nu_Shooz

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freur

Just to name a few.

For that matter, I see you've queestioned the notability of the band The Opposition, which was SO in another guise... do you feel that their number of albums are not enough, or they haven't had big enough hits, or...? If you're wanting it deleted, just put it up for a vote, no? I'd even see it reasonable to merge the SO page with the Opposition page. But together, the band has had a long career. If you feel that's mediocre, that's your choice, but they have had, you know, actual record contracts. ::Taniwha 16:12, 11 August 2006 (UTC)

Requesting your opinion

I wrote the article Dr. Jose Celso Barbosa Post Office Building Designation Act, the first bill in history that contains an article from Wikipedia. It appeared on DYK and right away somebody "tags" it for deletion. I inviteyou to express yourself here:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Jose Celso Barbosa Post Office Building Designation Act. Thank you Tony the Marine 16:20, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

David Dawson

Hi, I just created David Thomas Dawson. I went to David Dawson to create a redirect, but the page is protected. Could you either unprotect the page, or make it a protected redirect? Thanks, zappa.jake (talk) 06:40, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Sorted Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 11:00, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Query

If I make a page and some body edits it, how can I contact that person through wikipedia?

Go to the (edit) history page for the article - see who made the edit and click the talk part of his name in the edit history. Don't forget to sign your talk page edits so we know who you are by using ~~~~ Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 15:14, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Colin Spencer

Thanks for wiping out ten minutes of typing.Wjhonson 04:56, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Que? it's still there - I just corrected the capitalisation! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 04:58, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

No I was in the middle of an edit when you redirected out from under me. The edits are not preserved in that case, they are lost.

They may still be preserved in your browser. Might be worth running long edits in a sandbox until they're done to stop this sort of thing! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 05:00, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

They aren't I already tried that. Probably the redirecting was enough to confuse it. That is why I use the {{underconstruction}} tag to try to alert other editors NOT to step on me. I guess you're not familiar with that. Wjhonson 05:04, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

See my comments re the use of a sandbox to avoid accidents! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 10:00, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

We'll just have to agree to disagree on this one. I don't see any way to resolve it currently. You have you way of doing things and I have mine evidently. Wjhonson 18:22, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Holy Smokes, it was your Birthday on August 5

A Happy Super Belated Birthday! Better late then never. I've been a little busy with family health problems lately, but I want you to know that I never forget my good friends. Damn, you're getting old (smile). Take care Tony the Marine 20:32, 18 August 2006 (UTC)

Image:Image-Adolf Hitler Bigger.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Image-Adolf Hitler Bigger.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Agathoclea 13:35, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

I am hoping to get a final result one way or the other. Agathoclea 13:35, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

I have added my comments to the page - and do not see what the issue is - but am not bothered either way! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 15:21, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Notability

Brookie -- Please double check the Music Notability guidelines located here. Two pages I visited tonight had "notability" inserted on them by you, when, in fact, they were notable under these guidelines. Not a big deal... Jenolen 09:58, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 10:05, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Thank you, and a request

Dear Brookie, Thank you very much for deleting Big Royal Dig Article and Talk Page at 08:02 this morning. I am writing to you because this has been a traumatic, devastating and humiliating experience for me. I am in tears as I write, and I never thought I would feel that way in producing work for wikipedia, which has given me joy.

I would like you to read {http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Scott_Wilson#Big_Royal_Dig_deleted this], which is my note of today's date to Scott Wilson, who really showed utter bad faith and inimicality in his dealings.

I won't rehearse the whole thing again because you will find it both there and on Talk:Time Team.

Mainly, I am writing to you because I would like you as an administrator to warn Scott about this behaviour. I hope and intend to write more; I have asked him not to read or edit my work again. I now feel scared and inhibited. I am sure that he will not be above repeating these bullying actions again.

Please would you do whatever you can as an administrator to ensure that he is reprimanded under whatever machinery exists for this. I consider that he robbed me of the joy of producing a new article - and it was a sparkling one (I'm not in the business of turning in pallid works). He also robbed me of a readership by killing the article with a merge proposal while it was being written and then slamming the proposal on again as soon as the article was completed.

Something is wrong somewhere. It's utterly unethical behaviour and I'm tremendously saddened and damaged by the whole saga (sorry, still crying). Please take this as an official complaint. I was given a fight or flight option by a hostile reader, showing a complete lack of good faith. I never want him to touch my work again. -- FClef (talk) 13:20, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Dear FClef - thanks for the note - I will go and have a look at this user and see what's what. Please don't feel despondent over actions like this - there are lots of errant users out there who have no more sway than any one else. Just stick to your guns and keep up the good work. I am a Time Team fan myself. Be bold and be brave! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 13:40, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

Dear Brookie - thanks for reply. If you go both to Talk:Time Team and User talk:Scott Wilson you'll see the reply by User:Stephenb lamenting the loss of my article and saying he felt the second slapping was hasty. (Stephen has also asked me why the deletion on my Talk page. I will refer him to my remarks elsewhere.) Scott of course has shown no remorse - not that I care - dismissing the deletion with an "it's done now." He would have carved the article up and watered it down into Time Team. I am not sure whether his true objection was political or whether he resented the fact that it had been written at all.

Scott Wilson has apparently been accused of Sockpuppetry before so this may not be new behaviour for him.

I reiterate that I don't want him touching future work of mine.

Thanks for your support. -- FClef (talk) 12:31, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Traudlhead.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Traudlhead.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Angr 08:47, 2 September 2006 (UTC)

vote for me

im nominated for system operator (sysop) or admin vote for me please! here Qrc2006 16:42, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Deletedpages

When protecting deleted pages against re-creation, please use {{deleted}} or {{deletedpage}}. Otherwise, it shows up on Wikipedia:List of protected pages. Really, the {{protectedpage}} redirect should not be targetted at {{deletedpage}}, it would make more sense targetted at {{protected}}, if it is warranted at all. —Centrx→talk • 17:07, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Template:Protectedpage has been redirected to Template:Protected instead. —Centrx→talk • 23:52, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

Resolving disputes

Hello, i'm having a bit of trouble regarding another administrator. Unfortunatly he fell out with me and user:jimothytrotter. We have tried to resolve the situation by offering to forget about the incident and move on but he ignores us and deletes our messages from his talk page. What is your advice? Dean randall 19:42, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

I would walk away and let matters cool down and come back and try and make your peace in say 6 months time. If he is deleting your messages best not leave any for the time being! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 07:22, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

I have recently received a abnomal Special login

When I logged in earlier today I receive an unabnormal login message:

You have successfully signed in to Wikipedia as "Valoem".

Wikipedia has quite a number of guidelines, but you don't have to read them to edit here. Simply write what you want to contribute.

When writing articles, please strive for a neutral point of view, try to cite sources whenever possible, and do not submit copyrighted information.

When interacting with other people, please be nice to them and, when you disagree, discuss with them but don't edit war.

Remember that Wikipedia is an Encyclopedia, so some contributions might not be appropriate.

If you need further help, you can ask the friendly people at the village pump.

Return to Super Smash Bros. Melee.

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Userlogin"

I am not sure why this login changed and how it changes. Please help me thanks. Valoem ^talk 17:05, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Sorry - no idea! Try "The Village Pump" or the "Administrators' Noticeboard" - sorry! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 06:55, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

article names

Hi Brookie - when you get a chance, would you look over the page naming conventions for disambiguation, to see how links such as the ones in Ian Masters should be constructed? In short, the hyphen is not necessary, and parenthetical descriptions such as (songwriter) should not be capitalized. I'm already working on fixing the old edits, so don't worry about those, I just wanted you to be aware of the style guidelines in the future... Thanks for all of your good edits! -- nae'blis 16:36, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for that - it's hard to get these darn things right! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 16:37, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

No problem, I still get turned around and upside down from time to time... -- nae'blis 16:58, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Brookie (euphemism)

I see, so if they are real, you don't mind about quoting the ISBN and references pages then right? (sigh) Cliché Online 15:17, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

When I get home I'll dig out the ISBN numbers for you - sigh again ! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 15:18, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

good! you'll post me scans too then! :) Cliché Online 15:21, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

• No but you can Try this and this

Hey thanks, how sweet of you. My, you're already at home? You're a fast runner aren't you? Thanks for these precious references, I tought you'd give me just random ISBNs so I can't verify. You don't want to take actual screenshots in order to respect the authors copyrights is that right? Thanks for them and thanks for Amazon too, they have workers there who need cash to feed their familly right? I didn't thought at first, but seems you're an honest gentleman, actually....... Cliché Online 15:35, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

I work from home! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 15:37, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Good, you're the lucky one. Well, hope you'll visit me someday, we'll have a beer in a pub or something and we'll talk about roastbeef and stuff. Cliché Online 15:41, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

You're on ! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 15:45, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

Redirect: flypast

Dear Brookie - I'm the one you helped with Big Royal Dig deletion. I would like to ask you to delete a very recent redirect of flypast to flyby. I did not make the redirect, but I highlighted the word "flypast" in all its appearances a few months ago throughout the encyclopaedia, intending to write an article on it.

That time has now come - this weekend, I am going to write a very full article on flypast (mainly ceremonial) with many links. However, the very recent redirect has stopped me using that word as a title. It just happened over the last couple of days. Please could you delete the redirection or propose the deletion for me? Please reply to my talk page on this matter.

Perhaps I could also add that I will probably propose merging the flyby stuff (which has been an unsatisfactory stub for a long time) into the flypast article which should be much more fun...although, actually, what the US understand by flyby is NOT equivalent to flypast, which has a more ceremonial connotation - hence my upcoming article.

Thanks for all your help, and for comforting me the other day. By the way, I've just been accepted on the City of London Guides training course given by the Corporation of London, and am starting it on 4 Oct. Best wishes. -- FClef (talk) 00:53, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Dear Brookie please read in conjunction with the above. I wondered if I should for the moment call the article "Ceremonial flypast" - which means I could at least get it written. Then I would ask you to do a disambiguation page, and I would propose the deletion of [flyby]. ( I consider that article to be just a definition, which does not meet Wikipedia's standards for an article. It has not really been worked on for a while.) Then we could rename my article flypast, which is what it really is. But I would prefer the redirection to be deleted ASAP. I have read about deleting redirections and I understand that an early deletion of redirections is preferable, before people get confused. Please reply at my talk page and thanks again. -- FClef (talk) 02:02, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

Rabbit man

oops sorry I was trying to make the links on one of the pages more relevant but I'm new and don't think I've done it properly. wasn't trying to create problems, hope its OK...

Thanks

Thanks for your message on my talk page - and esp. for the sandbox! At the moment, I am accessing it from my user page by typing in User:FClef/sandbox in the Search box, but is there a simpler way?

Will contact you re further developments as discussed when flypast is written. Thanks again. By the way, are you aware about User: Giano leaving? Can anything be done to change that? -- FClef (talk) 23:31, 16 September 2006 (UTC)

Was it you...

who keeps deleting the phil da agony pages? These pages have been requested thats why I made it.

They may have been requested - but you need to follow the guidelines and establish notability otherwise the asrticle will be deleted Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 05:03, 27 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Basque.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Basque.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Hbdragon88 05:53, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Not really bothered - but thanks for the note. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 06:38, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

....long overdue...

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Brookie is awarded this barnstar for his devotion to helping clearing the deletion backlogs which are ignored by so many administrators. Your commitment to staying true to your words and honouring your "election promises" is very much appreciated in this political age. Thankyou, Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 08:59, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Traudlhead.jpg

Hello. The image of Traudl Junge that you uploaded has been restored provisionally. I want this picture to stay up since it is the only picture of her from the relevant time period. Can you tell me where you got it from? I'll do the rest to prove the image is free. Thanks a lot. nadav 20:46, 29 September 2006 (UTC)

As I recall I scanned it from the book "Until the final hour" The picture was her Russian occupied sector identity card picture. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 06:47, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

Flypast article

Dear Brookie, Hello - you will remember me from the ill-fated Big Royal Dig article. Finally I have made a good start on writing Flypast, which we discussed a while ago. Please refer to my progress so far and let me know your impressions on my talk page. I would value your input. Please note the article is an incomplete draft.

I would also like to refresh your memory of my enquiry and remind you of your reply to me.

I expect to finish this article soon. When I do I will take the following two steps: 1. I will call it "Ceremonial Flypast" as we agreed. 2. I will propose merging "Flyby" into it.

I would then hope that you would 1. take the actions we have previously discussed, culminating in changing its name to Flypast.

2. Please also put a watch on the article so that I do not undergo a malicious merge or deletion suggestion as happened with Big Royal Dig.

I will write again as soon as I've finished the article. In the meantime, please reply to my Talk page. Thanks for everything. Hope you have had a happy autumn equinox. Regards. FClef (talk) 22:44, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Simon Malian - citing references/sources

Hi Brookie,

Thanks for your recent message.

I was having some difficulties understanding why the Simon Malian article keeps getting listed as not citing relevant sources? There a three main claims within the article - (1) that Simon Malian is the founder of the Foundation which is evidenced within the cited radio interview, (2) that he completed his education at the University of Technology, Sydney which is evidenced within the cited alumni profile and (3) how the Foundation came about which is evidenced within the cited radio interview.

Is there something I am unaware of?

I appreciate your guidance.

Thanks again, Alexgoda 10:11, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

It wasn't me that posted that tag - perhaps better ask User:Calton who had posted this point! He can no doubt clarify this for you! Kind regards Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 12:17, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Warning vandals

You got it, no problem! Wildthing61476 16:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

Closing AfD

The templates are {{at}} and {{ab}} (or, "afd top" and "afd bottom"). They are used like this:

{{subst:at}} '''delete/keep/speedy delete...''' (possibly add an explanation here) ~~~~

discussion

{{subst:ab}}

They are to be used at the very begin and end of the subpage. For RfD, MfD, etc. there are other templates with similar names. Tizio, Caio, Sempronio 12:14, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Flypast - again

Dear Brookie - Thanks for your message on my Talk page. I have now done around two-thirds of the article. It is turning into a much bigger thing than I thought!

Please take another look at the draft so far, starting from WWII anniversaries - the 60th anniversaries. I appreciate your copyediting changes and hope to complete this weekend. - another 3 sections/subsections to be written.

Regarding your changes so far:

• thanks for the copyediting.
• I'm not sure about the header change ("Examples of flypasts" made a section with subsections). Perhaps we can review that once it is finished, for these are probably sections, not subsections.
• the beginning - when I inserted the pic I deleted the words "Ceremonial Flypasts" the copy below it is not the first section, it's the article header. "Ceremonial Flypasts" will be the interim title once it goes live!

Regarding the photograph, do you prefer the one I've used or is this one better?

When ready to go live, I will let you know. If you give me a local time - British - I will start the new page with the "Ceremonial Flypast" title and import the copy from my sandbox. You could then do any final editorial tweaks and immediately take the requisite actions to rename it "Flypast". (Early this Sunday evening will be good for me - between 1800-2000 hrs. - is that OK for you? - let me know please)

This has been a special situation because of the pre-existing redirect which is my article's title. I would like to thank you again for letting me do this under your aegis and for straightening this out. (reply please to my Talk page) Best wishes. -- FClef (talk) 14:38, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi there! I have made a few minor layout changes - but it's looking good. I prefer the other picture - as the first one is lost in cloud at a distance. I have deleted the existing flypast article with its redirect - so you can just recreate as your new article with that name - this save us having to try and match our times at the computer - and it achieves the same end. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 16:11, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi and thanks for minor layout change and syntactical change as well. I have posted flypast on Wikipedia, as it is already quite substantial. Will add to it over the weekend. You're right - the second photograph is better. Can you increase the size of it? I've tried unsuccessfully to do so, but think I am not understanding the instructions at Wikipedia:Images.

I'd be grateful if you could continue to watch this article for the moment.

Thanks again. -- FClef (talk) 22:26, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

I have resized the the picture and will watch the article Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 05:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Possible admin abuse from JDoorjam

Hey Brookie, I was sure who to turn to, but I feel that JDoorjam recent action is "questionable" I didnt take it up with him yet because i dont want to start unnecessary problems with an admin unless I am certain he has violated a rule.

He recently speedy deleted an article which did not fall into the category for speedy deletion. The article was a serious non advert article on pornographic actress Brooke Ashley. He deleted this article without an AfD debate which I felt was necessary. The deletion log shows that it is JDoorjam who deleted her (even though it does not show on his contributions). I have evidence to supporting her notability as well. She is one of the few adult entertainer who contracted HIV and formerly holds a pornographic record. Her name brings over 110,000 hits on google, she has an article on German wikipedia, has AVN article [1], and has been referenced (mentioned) by Luke Ford [2], [3]. Valoem ^talk 08:12, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

I have restored the article for you Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 13:11, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks! I would like to put JDoorjam through a Wikipedia administrator recall since I feel his violation is a repeated offense. Valoem ^talk 16:54, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Clifton Hall

Its great to see my stubs turning into articles. Thats one less for me to do :) MortimerCat 10:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Thank you very much. Please keep up the good work. Das Baz 17:31, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

didn't leave vanity piece

Simply added data about me from an existing link that was created by someone about a project that I am executive producer for; i.e. to remove the RED link that exists for me.

Please reconsider leaving data that I submitted.

PS: I also corrected incorrect information in that article that linked to wrong wiki links.

The article does not look strong enough to survive on its own outside a user space Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 08:24, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Go away

--R5hul 13:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC) Let me vandalize other pages

About Trick Daddy

You say that the trivia section is unencyclopedic? I agree that it's not paper-encyclopedic. However, you should know WIKIPEDIA IS NOT PAPER. That trivia is certainly notable, so it IS TOO encycolpedic. Tom Danson 01:55, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your thoughts! I disagree though... Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 04:35, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Teensay.co.uk

Can't delete it, it is exactly like the Teenspot.com article, and you haven't deleted that. If there is some issue with it, please tell me? Thanks.

That seems much more notable to me! Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 05:05, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

concerning teensay.co.uk.. again

Hello, again. I was wondering about re-creating the teensay.co.uk site, again. If I can make it more "neutral" and cut down on the advertising and so on, will you let me do it? Thanks again.

That would be better - but you do need to establish notability - can this be done? - read the Wiki guidelines. I suggest you create the article first in your sandbox User:Trillz/Teensay to get it up to speed first. The article is currently protected against re-creation - so let me see it first and I can unblock it if necessary. Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 09:47, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Ahem?

Now, I get that it was under a different name, but it has met all the damned requirements, I see nothing wrong with it. I would have waited for a response by yourself, but that took too long, so I decided to make do with what I could. The article was fine, it met the criteria, I say you should let it be reposted.

Why not follow the advice above and when you think it's okay go to the three or so users who had marked it before and get a view on it? This way you get to develop your article without constantly fighting fires with it - and when it's good it comes back alive? I have created you a sandbox - see above link - give it a go ! Also, please can you sign your notes with a ~~~~? Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 14:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Kevin Woods

What was the {{attention}} tag for? What is it that needs attention? - CobaltBlueTony 16:16, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

There's not much bio there - i would like to know more about him - where he's from, where educated etc Brookie :) - a will o' the wisp ! ^(Whisper...) 08:38, 12 October 2006 (UTC)