August 2015

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to No Longer 17 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: No Longer 17 was changed by Brilloman12 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.879371 on 2015-08-01T05:28:15+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:28, 1 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at David Bowie. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: David Bowie was changed by Brilloman12 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965595 on 2015-08-01T05:32:25+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:32, 1 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

Cluebot the bastard

edit

I hate cluebot, this computer changes everything I do, claiming I 'vandalised' the page. This is outrageous as my contribution was very useful. Brilloman12 (talk) 05:35, 1 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Banksia arctotidis, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Banksia arctotidis was changed by Brilloman12 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.886632 on 2015-08-01T05:39:38+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:39, 1 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

At least part of the problem you are having with cluebot is because your edits appear to be personal opinions and are without sources. I should also add that Wikipedia does not publish speculation or rumors. Content should be added only when it is definite and a reliable source can be cited for it. Here are some links to pages that can help you with editing Wikipedia:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages (but not article edits) by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. You may also ask me a question on my user talk page and I will answer it, if I can, or try to refer you to a source, page or person that might help, the next time I am online at Wikipedia. Donner60 (talk) 05:42, 1 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

  This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Cyamopsis. Donner60 (talk) 05:45, 1 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

The clue(less) bot

edit

Dear fellow wiki editors, I believe this cluebot should be used to stop vandalism but I believe the cluebots view on vandalism should be reduced. I believe this as my recent comments have not been used because the cluebot considers it vandalism even though my contribution was very useful. A fellow editor told me this occurs if the comment is a view or rumour without a source, however true this may be my comment was perfectly feasible. I think that this world is so wound up with the 'bad' people ruining education that their prevention for this is stopping the 'good' people help our global society for the better. Such as my useful comment which was not used due to this over protection. This must be stopped as useful editors are at threat of having their account removed as the cluebot believes they have vandalised their 'precious' website. So I ask for all editors to join me, and rise above these stupid, unnecessary features to have a reduce in their monitoring. Thank you 😃 Brilloman12 (talk) 06:06, 1 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

August 2015

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  --Bongwarrior (talk) 06:48, 1 August 2015 (UTC)Reply