User talk:Briannaking709/sandbox

Cassandra's Peer Review

Hi Brianna! First of all, the plans you have made are awesome. Everything is laid out very well and it seems like you have a great understanding of how you plan on contributing to the article stub "One-male group". The planning you have done is extensive and it ensures that coherence and unity will be present within your article, something that I have often seen to be lacking within the Wikipedia articles I have read. I also see that you have many articles that you plan on using which is awesome that you were able to find so many that went with your topic! You have articles that will both show advantages and disadvantages of one-male groups which is especially important to ensure that there is no biases within your article. The only thing I am hoping to see are some images within your article that show the statistical correlation for advantages/disadvantages. This is definitely a well put together plan for your article, great work! Cdc832 (talk) 14:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi Cassandra,

Thanks for looking at my outline! Images would go a long way for my final article. I definitely plan on including a few images! I will also look into finding statistics relating to advantages and disadvantages of this behaviour, and will include any relevant findings in my final article. Briannaking709 (talk) 20:31, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Donovan's Peer Review

Hi Brianna, it certainly seems like you're off to a great start! I noticed that you have a great layout of what you plan on adding to the article. The organization is on point and I'm sure it will make creating this article much easier since you have an idea as to what your going to include. It seems that you have an interesting and well documented/researched topic that you can draw lots of knowledge from, which again will help with making this article legitimate and professional. Overall, what you have planned seems great. Like Cassandra said images would go a long way, and to add to that, some examples of this in nature would help make this article grade A. I'm sure your planning on doing this but just getting the format and all sorted at this point. Looking forward to reading the finished product! Djmoq3 (talk) 20:30, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi Donovan, Thanks for the input! Adding images and real-world examples would definitely improve my final article. I'll be sure to add those in! Briannaking709 (talk) 20:31, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Beth's peer review

Hi Brianna, I really like the ideas you have to add to the article one-male groups. I think you have great topics and they are organized very well. As well, you have many good references to back up your topics. I think the only advice I could give you would be to give examples of specific animals that display this behaviour if you weren't planning on doing so. But, overall, you have many excellent ideas to improve this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bmw021 (talk • contribs) 02:03, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Hi Beth! Thanks for commenting on my outline. I think including some examples of species that participate in one-male groups is a gread idea! I'll be sure to add that to my final article :) Briannaking709 (talk) 20:31, 28 October 2017 (UTC)