Yes, please cite your additions in Preterism. Please remember, the references used need to be verifiable. We're trying to keep citations from blogs, message boards, etc. out of it. It also needs to be revised a little because of the weasel words used (as does the rest of the article...but this addition would be a good place to start). Thanks for the input. -charleca (talk) 20:08, 30 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Charleca, I've got tons of verifiable material I could cite. Ever hear of Google Books? It contains a virtual library of books on early Hyper-Preterism. Just give me a day or so, and I'll add as many citations I can find. --Brian Simmons (talk) 20:51, 30 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Good, stick it in there. That would be terrific. -charleca (talk) 01:42, 31 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Welcome...

Hello, Brian Simmons, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Virgil Vaduva (talk) 15:45, 31 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Three Reverts Rule edit

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Virgil Vaduva (talk) 18:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)Reply