User talk:Brewcrewer/Archives/2011/November
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
AE
Because your hounding has reached a new level of disruption, I have taken the issue to AE. You can see this here. nableezy - 15:04, 1 November 2011 (UTC)
Tendentiousness around "Judea and Samaria"
You are quite blatantly being tendentious. if you don't shut up, then I'm taking you to WP:AE.--Peter cohen (talk) 02:07, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
- Brewcrewer, rather than this, why not try and work on the history and build it up? Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:24, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
- That would be ideal yea, but I'm afraid all my work will end up being for naught when it will be removed by a bloc of editors claiming "POV problems."--brewcrewer (yada, yada) 23:54, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
Vandalism
I notice you accuse me of vandalism. I take that very seriously and ask you to explain yourself. How can the persons own words making a notable statement sourced to a reliable newspaper (including a VIDEO of him making the statement) be poorly sourced? Can I guess that you personally don't like it and are looking for some lame accusation to censor? Go ahead punk (talk) 14:43, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- We don't need a source about what actually happened, because the edit is about what Hikind claims. He claims in the same source both that his mother was gassed at Auschwitz, and that his mother survived Auschwitz. It is not our job as editors to guess what actually happened, only to report all notable views from reliable sources. The fact that the same source says two opposite things is not something for us ponder. Go ahead punk (talk) 15:28, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
- If you had read the source you are dismissing you would see that the material in question has been transcribed: "I walk these streets with my mother every Sabbath, my mother who went to Auschwitz in 1944. My mother went straight to the gas chamber." This tells me that you are dismissing a source as unverifiable and edit warring content WITHOUT ACTUALLY HAVING LOOKED AT THE SOURCE. Is that considered acceptable behavior? Go ahead punk (talk) 16:18, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Barnstar
Thank you, sir. You're a primary inspiration for it.--MichaelNetzer (talk) 15:00, 21 November 2011 (UTC)