[sic]

edit

I reverted your edit to the Silk Road article because you included a [sic] improperly. According to this part of the Manual of Style, editors should only use [sic] to indicate that they did not transcribe a quote in error whenever they think a reader might suspect that they had. I doubt that readers will misconstrue Schumer's use of "lightyears" as a transcription error. KLP (talk) 13:22, 23 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

April 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1-Chloro-1,2,2,2-tetrafluoroethane may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • suppression]] system. Other clean agents are approved for occupied areas but are more expensive (see Dupont's FM-200[[heptafluoropropane]].

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:12, 4 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 4 April

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:37, 5 April 2014 (UTC)Reply