Bluidy MacKenzie
February 2010
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Allison McKenzie. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article, or any other Wikipedia page, must include proper sources. Thank you. Woogee (talk) 23:25, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons. Thank you. Woogee (talk) 23:27, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Woogee (talk) 23:28, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Woogee (talk) 23:29, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Mfield (Oi!) 23:33, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Bluidy MacKenzie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Why have I been blocked? I vandalised the Allison McKenzie page, yes, but I stopped after my final warning. I have now been blocked for an "inappropraite username." You claim that is is "obviously profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia." 1) Clearly not profane in any way. 2) It doesn't threaten or attack anyone, and hardly impersonates anyone as it was the nickname of Scottish Lord Advocate George Mackenzie, who has been dead for over 300 years. It could in no way suggest that I am not here to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia: my edits have been vandalistic, but that's nothing to do with the username suggesting anything. I paid heed to the warnings, and subsequently refrained from vandalism. Therefore I ask for this erroneous block to be lifted from my IP so that my younger brother can engage in his pastime of constructive Wikipedia edits.
Decline reason:
I have reviewed your contributions thus far, and was not able to find evidence that unblocking this account would be likely to lead to a better encyclopedia. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:49, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Bluidy MacKenzie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I still don't see how this block was substantiated. I have disproven any notion than I am in violation of the username policy, so you return to commenting on the edits. Again, I stoppped vandalising after my final warning. Essentially, nothing whatsoever has been done to merit a block. Since that's clear, I trust that this wholly unfounded block will be lifted in order to allow my brother to edit.
Decline reason:
Provide proof that you are Ms MacKenzie, and we'll reconsider. As it is, your behavior does not inspire confidence. - Philippe 03:09, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
You appear not to understand the username violation; you will need to demonstrate that you are Allison MacKenzie before you can use her name. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 01:03, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
Bluidy MacKenzie (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
No you clearly don't understand. I'm not claiming to be Allison MCKenzie. I am using the nickname of a long deceased Scottish Lord Advocate, George MACKenzie (check the article). I am neither actress Allison McKenzie nor the 300 years dead George MacKenzie, and the two are not connected in any way. Please now lift the block.
Decline reason:
I don't care about the name, but on the basis of your contributions, it is obvious that blocking you is appropriate. --jpgordon::==( o ) 16:39, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
In accordance with Wikipedia tradition, I'm letting you have this third unblock request before I disable your talk page access. But we don't think it's clever for you to create an account just to make fun of your boss, and we aren't inclined to waste much time on your nonsense, so if you have anything sensible to say, now is the time. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:43, 24 February 2010 (UTC)