The United States v. The Heirs of Francisco De Haro

edit
 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The United States v. The Heirs of Francisco De Haro, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://openjurist.org/63/us/293/the-united-states-v-the-heirs-of-francisco-de-haro-deceased. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:28, 12 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Welcome

edit

Welcome!

Hello, Blue Dog Progressive, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! strdst_grl (call me Stardust) 16:14, 12 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

May 2010

edit

  Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content, as you did to the page The United States v. The Heirs of Francisco De Haro. Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it.

If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process. ~ neko-chan :3 (talk) 16:14, 12 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to The United States v. The Heirs of Francisco De Haro. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Uncle Dick (talk) 16:17, 12 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to The United States v. The Heirs of Francisco De Haro. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Uncle Dick (talk) 16:17, 12 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

United States v. De Haro

edit

Wikipedia has a specific format for U.S. Supreme Court cases that is located here - I have reworked the article to comply with that standard. The text of the actual case should be placed in Wikisource. Thanks for your efforts, and I hope you will continue to help improve Wikipedia. GregJackP (talk) 16:21, 12 May 2010 (UTC)Reply