BlackWidowMovie0000Editor

Hello, welcome to my talk page!

If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom, as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~

Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere.

Thank you!

Multiple accounts

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

The terms required for you to WP:VANISH are that you stop editing Wikipedia completely. Your creation of this account, and your use of it to continue to the same disruption as your previous account, are a violation of WP:SOCK.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:47, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

@Ponyo: Without revealing any private information, can you say one way or the other if WP:BMB applies? davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:16, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

@Davidwr: I believed that it did when I first reviewed the edits by this account, however I now realize that the original account is not currently blocked. I've inquired on the possibility of unvanishing the original account in order to allow other editors the ability to review the edits as a whole.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:22, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

I'll take that as a "no for now." If that changes to "yes" the editor has some non-reverted contributions under this account. Perhaps the "right to vanish" should include some stronger language that says, in effect, that the person is banned even if not blocked until he takes some unambiguous action to either un-vanish or do an off-wiki request for a "fresh start" (there are good reasons for allowing a vanish+fresh start, but it would be rare and have to be a high bar, like a health-and-safety issue). But that's a discussion for Wikipedia talk:Courtesy vanishing not for this talk page. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 22:28, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

@Ponyo: I am confused here. Can I, or can I not edit productively to Wikipedia? BlackWidowMovie0000Editor (talk) 23:59, 21 October 2020 (UTC)

Per WP:VANISH "Vanishing is not a way to start over with a fresh account. When you request a courtesy vanishing, it is understood that you will not be returning. If you want to start over, please follow the directions at Clean start instead of (not in addition to) this page. If you make a request to vanish, and then start over with a new account, and are then discovered, the vanishing procedure may be reversed, and your old and new accounts may be linked." You had your account renamed in order to avoid what appeared to be imminent sanctions on your former account, then just continued on with the same disruption via logged-out edits and via this account. That is not allowed.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:23, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

As your account has now been unvanished you can continue the discussion there, if you choose.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:45, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

I'm not the one who can answer that question. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 00:10, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BlackWidowMovie0000Editor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

User:PhilCoulson20 account is locked, I think, as I can't login. BlackWidowMovie0000Editor (talk) 18:33, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 20:52, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ping doesn't work if added after-the-fact

Just FYI, {{ping}} uses the WP:Notifications mechanism, which doesn't work unless it's part of an edit with a signature. There may be some other technical glitches I'm not aware of. I do know this: If you add a completely new line that has a ping in it and a signature and the end and nothing esoteric about it like tables and such, it almost always does the notification. At least, it's supposed to. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 00:33, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Got it. Thx BlackWidowMovie0000Editor (talk) 01:58, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (season 7)

@Favre1fan93: Hey Favre, if it's not too much trouble, could you add the Netflix release of AoS s7 in the US to the article? The correct reference is here, from ComicBook.com. Thanks! Please respond to this message if you can. https://comicbook.com/marvel/news/agents-of-shield-s-final-season-is-now-streaming-on-netflix/

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BlackWidowMovie0000Editor (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked because I used an alternate account to avoid impending sanctions on my other account. I deeply apologize for any pain I might have caused, and promise never to do it again.

Decline reason:

Talkpage already pulled -- Amanda (aka DQ) 09:10, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to edit or remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Do not do so again. Furthermore, if you continue to refuse to address the reason for your block, you are in danger of losing talk page access. --Yamla (talk) 10:44, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

@Yamla: I have added the reasoning. BlackWidowMovie0000Editor (talk) 17:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

I have already reviewed your unblock request and declined it. Another admin will be along eventually to review your current request. Given that you mislead us by claiming to retire, then mislead us into granting you a vanish request, I think it's pretty unlikely anyone will unblock you any time soon. Your best chance is probably to follow the instructions in WP:SO which require waiting six months before applying. At that point, you'd have to address the concerns that were leading to a sanction on your original account, along with your whole fake-vanish situation. Other admins may view the situation differently, though (and it's why you get independent admins reviewing each request). --Yamla (talk) 17:32, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

I basically retired, then after a few days decided to create a new account and try and start over, since there were no blocks on my previous account. BlackWidowMovie0000Editor (talk) 20:29, 2 November 2020 (UTC)

There were no sanctions on your account because you made a request to vanish in order to avoid sanctions, then created a new account to continue on with the same edits that landed your previous account in hot water. This contradicts both WP:VANISH and WP:CLEANSTART.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:59, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

As user was kind enough to tell us the prior account via UTRS, I have reviewed the relevant ANI thread and agree with Ponyo above. I ask the next reviewing admin to decline the current unblock request and ask user to appeal on that original account. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 21:08, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:59, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

UTRS 36831

UTRS appeal #36831 is now closed.

From what I gather in reading your talk page, you "vanished" ahead of receiving sanctions and then resumed disruptive editing under a new account. There is extensive discussion on your talk page about that, and I need not address those issues here. In so far as that goes, this request does not come close to addressing the concerns that led to your being blocked. Beyond that, your old account has been unVanished, and you need to request unblocking via that account.

Thanks. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:55, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:PhilCoulson20 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PhilCoulson20. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Amanda (aka DQ) 18:22, 20 December 2020 (UTC)