Regarding my COI with University Bible Fellowship edit

I resigned from the UBF group in 2011. While I do have a prior connection with the group, I have not been a member of the group since 2011.



The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


About removing tags from University Bible Fellowship edit

  I noticed you have removed the tags from the article. As you know, you shouldn't do that because you have a COI Wikipedia:Tagging_pages_for_problems#Removing_tags. You didn't discuss to have consensus to remove it while we are in disputing with Financial section and also as I mentioned in the talk page, I am working on finding more reliable sources regarding Reactions to make it balanced. Eventually, I want to remove it but we are still in disputes. Once we resolve them, we can ask for a RFC for any editor without a COI to remove the tag. I think you'd better to put it back for now. Dlee612 (talk) 02:57, 26 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

You are disputing neutral financial facts for the sake of dispute, not because you have made any useful edits or suggestions, as noted by an Admin. Bkarcher (talk) 09:43, 26 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Please put the tags back. You've dogmatically removed them, past dispute talks and my talks as well without discussion and consensus. Do you think it is not a violation for an editor with a COI to remove the tags? If you think it is ok, I want to ask an Admin. Dlee612 (talk) 07:10, 27 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Discussion is not the only way to reach consensus. Starting in May 2020, I followed the RfC advice given and applied other methods to reach consensus. Bkarcher (talk) 11:14, 8 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

ANI Notice edit

  Please notice that there is currently a discussion at [1] regarding your behaviour to remove tags, old talks and talks between you and me without any discussions and consensus. Dlee612 (talk) 14:12, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Wow, you went straight to the highest authority in Wikipedia? Skipping the dispute resolution protocols is not recommended. Bkarcher (talk) 18:57, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
I asked you several times to put it back and discuss but you refused for discussion and ignored. Your behaviour is not recommended. Dlee612 (talk) 18:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.