Bjornsonw

Protocols

The talk page isn't a forum for your views: it's clear that you have an agenda beyond article improvement. Please stop disrupting the talkpage. Acroterion (talk) 22:16, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

I'm in agreement with the above. Bjornsonw—wiki is not a WP:FORUM. The WP:TALK page is primarily for improving the article. Suggest concrete and specific changes that you would like so that others can respond. You are welcome to participate. But it is the article that we should be talking about rather than peripheral issues.

This is in reference to this edit. Bus stop (talk) 22:54, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, you are reminded not to attack other editors, as you did on User talk:Acroterion with this edit. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you, That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 22:39, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

WIkipedia is not a soapbox for your views on Jews. Please stop. Persistent soapboxing may lead to suspension of your editing privileges. Acroterion (talk) 22:42, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:47, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Acroterion (talk) 22:50, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

I've brought up your conduct at WP:ANI. Acroterion (talk) 22:53, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at User talk:Acroterion, you may be blocked from editing. CTJF83 23:17, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Here is the relevant thread. Sir William Matthew Flinders Petrie | Say Shalom! 23:42, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Please understand

One editor cannot command another to "not interfere". Employing terms like "crazy goy" and "Humanzees" is a quick path to oblivion. Please visit Wikipedia:Five Pillars and understand what the aims of this project are. Tiderolls 00:07, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you have been adding your signature to some of your edits to articles. This is a common mistake to make and has probably already been corrected. There is no need to sign your edits to article content, as the article's edit history serves the function of attributing contributions, so you only need to use your signature to make discussions more readable, such as on article talk pages or project pages such as the Village Pump. If you would like further information about distinguishing types of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thank you for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 09:47, 15 January 2012 (UTC)