February 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Bentogoa. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Diyarbakır  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Bentogoa (talk) 14:17, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Şırnak with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Bentogoa (talk) 14:20, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Şanlıurfa, you may be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:26, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Akçakale. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 19:28, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  m.o.p 19:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)Reply