IP Block - 28th October 2016

edit

Hi there, can I just say how wonderful an experience it is to be registered on Wikipedia and hopefully, using some of my graduate insight, to make a great contribution to articles relating to modern British politics. I am a little bewildered as to why there is an IP block - working in an office with God knows how many people, there is a possibility its one of our own but I don't feel a necessity to ask around. I would like the IP Block lifted but whoever you have blocked, for whatever reason, is your decision. I feel it unfair we all have to pay the brunt for an idiot's actions.

On a brighter note, I enjoyed creating my user page last night - check it out here!

 
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Birmuk (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
194.72.152.54 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

advertisement/spam related


Decline reason: Now blocked directly for abusing multiple accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 08:14, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Birmuk (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
1-194.72.152.54 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

this is meat not sock puppetry. This is extremely unjust!


Decline reason: Sock or meat - both get treated the same. Peridon (talk) 11:15, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Peridon please - I am willing to make a decent contribution to Wikipedia - I love writing articles! Can I not have a timed block or a suspended sentence?

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Birmuk (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

please read above! I'm not a vandal!

Decline reason:

Procedural decline: Only one unblock request at a time, please. See below. Huon (talk) 16:26, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note: You're using the wrong template, so I changed it for you. Also, you're not blocked for vandalism. You're blocked because this account, Sabloem (talk · contribs), and TheHumbugBar (talk · contribs) are   Technically indistinguishable. All three have also participated in this deletion discussion regarding an article created by one of the accounts. ​—DoRD (talk)​ 11:55, 28 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Birmuk (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

1 We are all part of a company and Sabloem introduced us to Wiki. However, we think its unjust that we are both blocked as a result. Can you not look back at TheHumbugBar's user page. It is different from mine and Sabloem's (detail-wise), does that make us technically indistinguishable. We all studied history or politics at University (where we met) so I decided to put my views on TheHumbugBar's article for deletion discussion.Birmuk

Decline reason:

Procedural decline: Only one unblock request at a time, please. See below. Huon (talk) 16:26, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(talk) 12:00, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Birmuk (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

is there any chance of the block being timed, or a suspended sentence put in place

Decline reason:

So all three of you studied at the same university, work for the same company, and happen to all independently be interested in the obscure topic of Empire loyalty? Sorry, I don't believe that. Clear-cut meatpuppetry, which you even admitted above. Huon (talk) 16:26, 30 October 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

DoRD does this look like it will remain as an indefinite ban on this IP address. I'm really saddened how something, that wasn't even clearly promotional, has caused this much aggro. Please get back to me asap.