Shark Sucker edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Shark Sucker, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://octopus.gma.org/fogm/Echeneis_naucrates.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:09, 20 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:45, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hairy-eared Dwarf Lemur edit

Wikipedia edits, if something other than a trivial fix, must have source citations so that other editors and readers can verify the data. I'm reverting (again) the edits to Hairy-eared Dwarf Lemur. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:41, 4 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

Simply listing the sources is insufficient. Please inline the citations using <ref> tags. If you do not do so, I will revert the article again. - UtherSRG (talk) 03:49, 5 December 2007 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply