Welcome edit

Welcome!

Hello, Billtechguy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Vianello (Talk) 19:10, 16 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Re: Your question edit

Thanks for asking! It's a legit question. For one thing, I'm gonna slap a general welcome template up on this page that has some useful links, but let me highlight the main issues.

  1. All Wikipedia article subjects are subject to guidelines on WP:Notability.
  2. Companies specifically have their own guidelines that narrow the focus of the notability criteria a bit, which you can view at WP:CORP. Other subjects, like music for instance, have their own "personal" notability criteria.
  3. If the company meets one or more criteria, it's necessary to reference this in the article with a reliable source - see WP:Reliability and WP:Verifiability. You don't want to just slap up, "This company is notable because X". Rather, just include the facts that make it notable, and provide the references that demonstrate this is verifiable information.
  4. For information on how to make references, you can refer to the article WP:Citing sources. But I personally learn better by imitation, so consulting an existing article might also be helpful, and copying their formatting. Another useful tool is the RefTools function, which is a gadget you can enable by clicking My Preferences (along the top of the screen on any Wikipedia page), clicking the Gadgets tab, and ticking RefTools. This adds a handy button to the right of the various function buttons while editing a page (it looks like "{{cite}}"), which brings up a list of reference types (web, book, journal, etc.) and then a list of information fields to fill in, such as the URL at which the info is available if online, etc.
  5. Lastly, an especially common pitfall when writing about companies is using non-neutral or promotional language. Wikipedia articles should avoid making any kind of "judgment call" on the quality of things, though referencing other verifiable sources that have made such comments is permissible. Ex: "Bob said 'This product ruined my life!'", if "Bob" is a reliable source and the citation is verifiable. Check WP:NPOV for information on this.

So, I'd suggest starting at WP:CORP and working from there if the company in question meets notability criteria outlined there. If you need anything else, just ask. - Vianello (Talk) 19:10, 16 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Please note edit

The use of ® and ™ is not customary on Wikipedia - it's in a policy somewhere but I can't remember which. (Apart from which, seeing these used in an article sets the 'spam!' bell ringing in many patrollers' minds.) Peridon (talk) 16:02, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

The relevant page in the manual of style is WP:TRADEMARK. -- Bk314159 (Talk to me and find out what I've done) 17:13, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Pinpointsx edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Pinpointsx, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Bk314159 (Talk to me and find out what I've done) 17:08, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply